A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between possible neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental worries, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Moments posting about René Collier and also the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has progressed right into a extremely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development operates at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to develop their spouse and children dwelling. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Ireland’s coastline, wherever development pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of recognized inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being built by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted under organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Particular Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as such areas are topic to demanding controls underneath European and Irish environmental legislation. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological outcomes, especially in a very delicate coastal surroundings which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the proper posture. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to maintain their watch, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal setting up disputes, in which views of the sea are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary initiatives because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the site, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-substantial water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, an image that has since come to be emblematic with the intensity from the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they were intended to Acquire visual proof on the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site within the sea Irish Periods claimed, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o throughout severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm h2o to photograph the location grew to become one of the most hanging descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Times write-up about accountant Paul Feely famous that such steps have been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into a location influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC Irish Times article about René Collier was being encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up protected in detail through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key moment in the lawful timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as produced, goes over and above what was authorized and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, is referred to as meticulous in his examination of preparing files, maps, and ailments attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their action is motivated by worry for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their very long-standing link to the area and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair basically attempting to produce a family members household in accordance With all the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Particular Space of Conservation and say that all will work are actually performed depending on Qualified advice and accepted strategies. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering The ocean during a storm, don't change the underlying facts.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about design of wall at coastal web-site happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier mentioned which the businessman experienced previously been linked to regional advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from quite diverse Specialist backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waist-significant water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the outcome remains uncertain. The court docket need to establish if the wall as created complies with arranging permission and no matter if any encroachment into a Specific Location of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and setting up ailments. Nevertheless the human factor stays central: neighbours who need to live together with each other lengthy once the authorized expenses have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when basic challenges for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether it is going to in the long run be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to The most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.